TRUST PROVEN EXPERTISE
Bondurant attorneys have the experience you want
and the strategic thinking you need.
TRUST PROVEN EXPERTISE
Bondurant attorneys have the experience you want
and the strategic thinking you need.
TRUST PROVEN EXPERTISE
Bondurant attorneys have the experience you want
and the strategic thinking you need.
TRUST PROVEN EXPERTISE
Bondurant attorneys have the experience you want
and the strategic thinking you need.
Bondurant announces that four attorneys have been recognized as “Litigation Stars” in the 2026 edition of Benchmark Litigation. The honor identifies lawyers regarded as preeminent litigation practitioners in the U.S. and signals strong peer and client feedback, as well as a proven track record of success.
The firm is also designated “Highly Recommended” in Georgia, Benchmark’s top tier for dispute resolution firms. Bondurant stands out as the only boutique of its size to hold this distinction alongside global Am Law 100 firms.
Bondurant’s recognized attorneys and their practice areas are:
Emmet Bondurant: Commercial, Securities
Ben Fox: Commercial, White Collar Crime
Frank Lowrey: Appellate, Commercial, Competition/Antitrust
Mickey Mixson: Commercial, Securities
Benchmark Litigation is a research-driven guide focused exclusively on litigation and dispute resolution, with rankings based on extensive interviews with litigators, dispute-resolution specialists, and clients, as well as market analysis of the most significant cases.
TRUST PROVEN EXPERTISE
Bondurant attorneys have the experience you want
and the strategic thinking you need.
Earlier this year, Bondurant associates Jeff Chen and Matthew Sellers filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in Bowe v. United States, a federal habeas case arising out of the Eleventh Circuit. Jeff and Matthew submitted the brief, which supports Petitioner Michael Bowe, on behalf of a group of legal scholars, including Steve Vladeck, the Agnes Williams Sesquicentennial Professor of Federal Courts at the Georgetown University Law Center, who also co-authored the brief.
The Supreme Court heard argument in Bowe last week, during which Mr. Bowe’s counsel cited and summarized the amicus brief in response to questioning from several Justices about Congress’s power over the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction.
Bowe highlights conflicting interpretations of a statute that limits repeat habeas corpus petitions. Several federal courts, including the Eleventh Circuit, have applied the statute to federal prisoners, which has effectively foreclosed relief to people like Mr. Bowe who are serving time for convictions that are no longer legally valid.
Jeff and Matthew’s amicus brief addresses a neighboring statutory provision that strips the Supreme Court of jurisdiction to review gatekeeping determinations regarding repeat habeas corpus petitions. After describing the constitutional limits on Congress’s power to take jurisdiction away from the Supreme Court, the brief warns that construing the jurisdiction-stripping provision to apply to Mr. Bowe’s case would raise serious constitutional concerns.
Read the full brief here.
TRUST PROVEN EXPERTISE
Bondurant attorneys have the experience you want
and the strategic thinking you need.
TRUST PROVEN EXPERTISE
Bondurant attorneys have the experience you want
and the strategic thinking you need.
TRUST PROVEN EXPERTISE
Bondurant attorneys have the experience you want
and the strategic thinking you need.
TRUST PROVEN EXPERTISE
Bondurant attorneys have the experience you want
and the strategic thinking you need.
TRUST PROVEN EXPERTISE